Skip to main content

Creating Incrementing Variables in Code with Ruby

I had a project I was working on that required me to assign values to incremental variables from an array.  A quick solution to the problem, using very little meta-coding is below in its most basic form.  One class was my data or value class.  It held the incremental variables I wanted to assign to.  Here It's called, "Foo".  The class that is using this data is "Bar".  Just for spice, I randomized the array values to assign to the data variables.



class Foo
    attr_accessor :i0, :i1, :i2, :i3

    initialize
        @i0 = 0; @i1 = 0; @i2 = 0; @i3 = 0
    end
end

class Bar
 attr_accessor :f

    def initialize
        @f = Foo.new
        @image_sort = %w{ 1 2 3 4 }.shuffle
    end

    def setup
        @image_sort.each_with_index do  | i, idx |
            @f.instance_variable_set( :"@i#{idx}", i )
        end

        puts @f.i0
        puts @f.i1
        puts @f.i2
        puts @f.i3
    end
end

g = Bar.new
g.setup


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Codeigniter vs. Kohana Database access speeds

I was doing some basic profiling for a project in which I needed the fastest raw speed I could get with database queries. I'm a fan of Codeigniter for projects that are suitable for it, but had heard from some that Kohana was faster, so I decided to do a very basic comparison of the two. I was using MAMP for OSX, and created a very small db, with a table that had 3 fields: (id), (first), and (last). The data sample was also very small, only a few records. The basic query I tested was a "SELECT * FROM [table]". There is of course nothing remotely scientific about this. It was just a quick ad dirty, very limited comparison. Take it as such. Versions used: CI2.1.3, Kohana 3.3.0. Codeigniter I really like Codeigniter (CI). But, one thing that is very evident from their own profiling functions, is that CI is a bit of a memory hog! Essentially, the same Controller function running in CI takes approximately 10X more memory than in Kohana! This in itself is not ...

Screen Scraping in Ruby with Watir and Nokogiri

I was given an interesting challenge to scrape some data from a specific site.  Not to write a completed, packaged solution, but rather just to scrape the data.  The rub being, the site uses Javascript paging, so one couldn't simply use something like Mechanize.  While a self-contained product would require inclusion of V8 (as the Javascript would need to be run and evaluated), to just scrape the data allows making use of whatever is easy and available.  Enter Watir . Watir allows "mechanized/automated" browser control.  Essentially, we can script a browser to go to pages, click links, fill out forms, and what have you.  It's mainstay is in testing, but it's also pretty damned handy in cases where we need some Javascript on a page processed... like in this case.  Keep in mind though, it is literally automating a browser, so you'll see your browser open and navigate to pages, etc. when the script runs.  But, there is also a headless browser opti...

Passing Functions and Lambdas into Functions with Ruby

Ruby's New Style of Lambda Functions f = ->( m ) { p m } f.call( 1 ) #=> 1 Which of course means the same thing as: f = lambda { |n| p n } f.call(1) #=> 1 Ruby Proc Objects p = Proc.new { |n| p n + 2 } p.call(2) #=> 4 Using a Function as a Closure in Ruby def domo( k ) ->(m) { p m + k } end z = domo( 5 ) z.call( 5 ) #=> 10 Function :domo takes a single parameter. Within :domo , we create a lambda that takes a single parameter, and adds that parameter to the value :domo takes in as its parameter. Then, we assign z to be the result of the lambda in :domo with its 'k' parameter loaded with 5. When z is called, we pass (another) 5 to it. This parameter loads the lambdas n parameter. The lambda executes, essentially adding n (5) + k (5) and yielding the result of 10. The thing about closures such as this is, we can load the initial value of the lambda to be whatever we want it to be when assigning the function :domo '...