Skip to main content

Boost on OS X using the brew boost keg

I was installing boost today using the *brew keg*, which shows it's for the latest version, 1.55.0, but I kept running into errors.
  1. --HEAD
  2. --with-mpi
In the case of #1, it kept puking every time it tried to grab boost from svn. In the case of #2, no matter what I did, including this option kept giving a warning about Python support soon to be deprecated. And yes, I tried the
--without-python`
option. It just wasn't happening. I don't know if it's a problem with the keg, or a problem with this particular build of Boost. Finally, I was successfully able to get things to build using:
brew install boost --c++11 --with-icu --without-python --without-single

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kicking things off

My purpose here is to document various thoughts and findings as things come up, or come to mind.  All strictly technical, and kind of a development diary of sorts.  While ideally, others may find these things useful, my main intent is to have them here for my reference ;-) Still, I'll try to write them in tutorial fashion

Passing Functions and Lambdas into Functions with Ruby

Ruby's New Style of Lambda Functions f = ->( m ) { p m } f.call( 1 ) #=> 1 Which of course means the same thing as: f = lambda { |n| p n } f.call(1) #=> 1 Ruby Proc Objects p = Proc.new { |n| p n + 2 } p.call(2) #=> 4 Using a Function as a Closure in Ruby def domo( k ) ->(m) { p m + k } end z = domo( 5 ) z.call( 5 ) #=> 10 Function :domo takes a single parameter. Within :domo , we create a lambda that takes a single parameter, and adds that parameter to the value :domo takes in as its parameter. Then, we assign z to be the result of the lambda in :domo with its 'k' parameter loaded with 5. When z is called, we pass (another) 5 to it. This parameter loads the lambdas n parameter. The lambda executes, essentially adding n (5) + k (5) and yielding the result of 10. The thing about closures such as this is, we can load the initial value of the lambda to be whatever we want it to be when assigning the function :domo '...

Add pre-compiled Elixir on OS X

So, I've been a big Erlang fan for a few years now, and then found out about Elixir :  what I would describe as kind of a Ruby -ish creamy frosting on top of Erlang . But I'll address more on both in future. Right now, I thought I'd just give a quick and dirty way to add Elixir , if you've already got Erlang installed (hint: check-out this Erlang Solutions link for a pre-compiled Erlang solution).  You can also use brew to install both , but I have found that with the simplicity of brew, you give up having the most current version of software.  In both cases. The pre-compiled zip for the most current version of  Elixir can be found here .  Unzipping reveals a folder containing everything you need.  For simplicity's sake, keeping everything pertaining to Elixir all within this folder makes the most sense.  By doing so, all that's needed is to position the folder, and then make links to all the executables in a directory already in our path.  Through t...