Skip to main content

Install current SBCL on OS X

You must have Command Line Tools installed. If you don't, this tutorial is not for you. Google: installation of XCode and Command Line Tools.

Normally, I use brew to install things (when it offers a solution), but in this case the keg version was a couple minor version's off. And, there had been sufficient addition's that motivated me to want the current release. So, building from source was the path of least resistance.

First, what not to do:

The note's caution against using OS X's Terminal, as their make.sh script pukes a shit-ton of text during the build, and according to them, it can slow the build. I did not experience an issue with this, compared to other builds I've done in the past.  BUT, they also say build can be accomplished with other LISP's installed (you must have a lisp installed prior to building). OMFG, unless you want to wait a month of Sunday's, my experience building with CLISP was slower than the Molasses in January.  Do yourself a favor if you don't have an install of sbcl already  (likely from brew as it is a few minor version's behind the current one at this time), install sbcl from brew FIRST!!!  Build went so much faster.

So, here's what I recommend:

Install sbcl using brew.  If you don't already have brew installed, why the frak not?  Install it. You can thank me later.

Ok, so you've installed sbcl using brew. Now, download the current version from sbcl's website,  untar/unbzip it, and cd into the new directory. For illustrative purposes, in my case it's /sbcl-1.2.5. Once inside, you can follow their prescribed method (you may need to sudo first):

sh make.sh

It will pick-up the current install of sbcl and use it. Once it's done, uninstall brew's version of sbcl:

brew uninstall sbcl

Now, (again, you may need to sudo first):

sh install.sh

You should now have the current sbcl available in your path at:

/usr/local/bin/sbcl
Labels:
Location: Portland, OR, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kicking things off

My purpose here is to document various thoughts and findings as things come up, or come to mind.  All strictly technical, and kind of a development diary of sorts.  While ideally, others may find these things useful, my main intent is to have them here for my reference ;-) Still, I'll try to write them in tutorial fashion
Post a Comment
Read more

Creating Incrementing Variables in Code with Ruby

I had a project I was working on that required me to assign values to incremental variables from an array.  A quick solution to the problem, using very little meta-coding is below in its most basic form.  One class was my data or value class.  It held the incremental variables I wanted to assign to.  Here It's called, "Foo".  The class that is using this data is "Bar".  Just for spice, I randomized the array values to assign to the data variables. class Foo attr_accessor :i0, :i1, :i2, :i3 initialize @i0 = 0; @i1 = 0; @i2 = 0; @i3 = 0 end end class Bar attr_accessor :f def initialize @f = Foo.new @image_sort = %w{ 1 2 3 4 }.shuffle end def setup @image_sort.each_with_index do | i, idx | @f.instance_variable_set( :"@i#{idx}", i ) end puts @f.i0 puts @f.i1 puts @f.i2 puts @f.i3 end end g = Bar.new g.setup
Post a Comment
Read more

Passing Functions and Lambdas into Functions with Ruby

Ruby's New Style of Lambda Functions f = ->( m ) { p m } f.call( 1 ) #=> 1 Which of course means the same thing as: f = lambda { |n| p n } f.call(1) #=> 1 Ruby Proc Objects p = Proc.new { |n| p n + 2 } p.call(2) #=> 4 Using a Function as a Closure in Ruby def domo( k ) ->(m) { p m + k } end z = domo( 5 ) z.call( 5 ) #=> 10 Function :domo takes a single parameter. Within :domo , we create a lambda that takes a single parameter, and adds that parameter to the value :domo takes in as its parameter. Then, we assign z to be the result of the lambda in :domo with its 'k' parameter loaded with 5. When z is called, we pass (another) 5 to it. This parameter loads the lambdas n parameter. The lambda executes, essentially adding n (5) + k (5) and yielding the result of 10. The thing about closures such as this is, we can load the initial value of the lambda to be whatever we want it to be when assigning the function :domo '...
Post a Comment
Read more